Is the New SAT the Adolescent Equivalent of the Tax Code? [by Samuel Johnson]

Duke EllingtonThey’re reforming the SATs again, which means the columnists are duking it out about the efficacy of standardized testing, the merits of the venerable scoring sytem in which 800 aces the test, and the question of whether multiple choice questions, in which you are rewarded for guessing even if you don’t know for sure, are systematicaly biased against the have-nots.

We asked Silys Tompkin Comberback of the Princeton Institute of Advanced Studies for his opinion, and he countered with a multiple-choice exam that would function as a rebus except that deciphering the message correctly will offer unambiguous rewards whereas surviving an IRS audit, which has been likened to going through an autopsy while still alive, assures one only of survival, a dubious merit, like being an author and getting to call your villian after the name of the single biggest asshole you know. Here, try Professor Comberback’s questions for yourself and see whether you agree with the solution formed by the pattern that results:

“Like the crusade to make all Americans homeowners, [the idea of college for all is] now doing more harm than good.” Vocational training is better than “dumbed down college.” Who said it?

a) The former drug czar who foresees the divorce of private education from public subsidy

b) Jennifer Lawrence, who graduated high school two years early in Kentucky and collected an Academy Award for Best Actress

c) Duke Ellington, Earl Warren, or Count Fleet

d) Coleridge in Biographia Literaria as translated by a modern computer program named — with the exuberant irreverence of Silicon Valley — Plato

e) Hillary Clinton

       

Related Stories

 

Go to Source
Author: The Best American Poetry