“Unlocking the Future: How AI Rights Could Rewrite the Rules of Humanity According to Visionary Babis Marmanis”
So why do you think they did not require any specific technology?
Well, the truth is that the various RELs go into different depths in the data they specify and they take different approaches in terms of how their instructions should be processed. Perhaps the EU did not want to commit to a single standard that is best in a particular set of circumstances but not the best for other cases. This is not a material problem, in my view, but that would be a plausible explanation for their choice.
Historically, publishers and authors reserved rights with a copyright notice or the statement “all rights reserved.” STM publishers typically attach Creative Commons licenses to content that is openly available. Are those “machine readable?”
