Unveiling the Future: Ten Game-Changing Priorities Reshaping Scholarly Publishing by 2027
Resources for the conversation
The following organisations offer standards, services, or examples relevant to these priorities. Listing them does not imply that they endorse this article.
| Priority | Organisations to explore |
| Responsible AI | STM; COPE; International Science Council |
| Research integrity | STM Integrity Hub; COPE; BioCore Trust Seal |
| Content rights and AI licensing | STM; Copyright Clearance Center; Creative Licensing International |
| Usable knowledge and metadata | Crossref; DataCite; ORCID |
| Open access and open science | cOAlition S; DOAJ; Center for Open Science |
| Sustainable participation | cOAlition S; DOAJ; Research4Life |
| Accessibility | W3C; DAISY Consortium; Fondazione LIA |
| Privacy and preservation | NISO; CLOCKSS; PORTICO |
| Broader measures of success | CoARA; DORA; STM |
Industry publications also help these conversations travel. Research Information, The Scholarly Kitchen, The Chronicle of Higher Education, The Geyser, David Worlock’s Coalition of the Curious, and Outsell bring different audiences and perspectives to questions about research, publishing, and the information economy. Mainstream outlets, including The New York Times and The Wall Street Journal, can help connect developments in scholarly communication to their wider public consequences.
Post Comment