The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) defines slack-fill as the difference between the size of a container and the volume of product contained therein. And while the agency does try to hunt down the misleading ones that do not allow the consumer to fully view its contents, every potato chips lover would tell you that they still hit the shelves.
Luckily, there’s the r/NonFunctionSlackFill subreddit that works hard to expose them — its 49.1K members regularly share pictures of packages looking like they were intentionally designed to lure away our money. Continue scrolling to check out the most infuriating examples.
#1 Biggest Letdown I’ve Had In A While
Image credits: demonic_pug
We got in touch with one of the moderators of the subreddit and, judging from the chat we had, the community is pretty civil and inclusive too.
“Most of the work I do is [just] removing things that aren’t actually nonfunctional slack fill, like packaging for medical products,” they told Bored Panda.
“A wide variety of products are posted here, but I see candy and beauty/hygiene products posted most often,” the moderator added.
#2 Only Function Here Is To Trick You Into Thinking It’s A Bottle
Image credits: ABAFBAASD
#3 Buoyancy
Image credits: baselganglia
According to Nina van Toulon, the initiator of the Indonesian Platform for Prevention and Management of Waste, some slack-fill is needed.
“One valid reason for functional slack-fill is product protection,” she explained. “Good examples are packages filled with chips or cookies. The extra space prevents damage to the product by outside pressure, without this empty space, your product would crumble.”
“Another valid reason is avoiding product loss due to spilling when opening the package,” she added.
#4 This Bamboozling Package
Image credits: alfatems
#5 Bath Bombs
Image credits: Bobrobot1
Another reason is called settling. “Some products fill up a package at production time and the product ‘settles’ to a lower level inside the packaging over time, for example, flour.”
“[One more] technical reason is the closing process of the packaging after it is filled in a production line,” van Toulon continued. “There needs to be an allowance of extra material to seal the packaging properly, which in some cases (and depending on the type of packaging) results in some empty space.”
#6 Why Do You Have To Play Me Like That?
Image credits: Flozender
#7 Not Buying This Kind Of Box From Michaels Again
Image credits: lookitslaurie
#8 Does This Count?
Image credits: Zacipult
#9 I Know Popcorn Is Mostly Air, But
Image credits: LykaiosAvery
However, as we can see, sometimes there’s simply too much slack-fill. “Non-functional slack-fill is a neglected topic. Publications on regulating slack-fill [are] scarce and U.S. lawsuits are mostly related to misleading consumers and not to the unnecessary use of materials, of which the majority of certain packaging materials is not effectively being recycled,” van Toulon said.
#10 This “Box” Of Beef Jerky
Image credits: philipsdirk
#11 A Yard Of Snickers. Sorry, But I Tore Out The Cardboard Flaps That Kept Them Centered
Image credits: casewood123
#12 The Solar Panel Of My Flashlight Came Off And Reveals A Block Of Concrete To Make It Feel More Well-Built And Heavy
Image credits: hitmannumber862
#13 Why Is This Not Illegal
Image credits: thedudefromsweden
One reason why we see so much of it, according to the expert, boils down to the producers trying to create a feeling of “more value for your money.”
“Consumers need to rely on the amount of grams or pieces printed on the packaging when the product is … in non-transparent packaging,” van Toulon highlighted. “When the number of pieces is mentioned, it is clear what you get for your money.”
Another reason why companies do this is trying to stand taller than their competitors’ products on the store shelves.
#14 Sales Genius
Image credits: GillyGilly21
#15 Coloring Book For My Son
Image credits: PhotosByDrew
#16 An Airport Sandwich At Its Finest!
Image credits: MrCharlieBones
#17 This Jumbo Tube Is Only Filled To The Letter E
Image credits: ebjazzz
#18 2/5 Away
Image credits: sean_Biota
#19 I Get That Samples Are Samples, But What A Waste Of Plastic
Image credits: IamthebestPotatp
#20 You Can Probably Imagine My Daughter’s Disappointment When We Opened Up This Crayola “Super Art Tub”
Image credits: arka80
The packages we see in the pictures should be downsized not only because it misleads the buyers. “The unnecessary and excessive use of packaging aggravates the climate, waste and plastic pollution crises, at all stages from resource extraction, production, distribution, transport in collection systems, landfilling, incineration, and recycling,” van Toulon said.
#21 These Were £5…guess I Should Have Checked The Weight. 330ml Coke For Scale
Image credits: throw_away_17381
#22 Xtreme Asshole I’d Say
Image credits: Bobrobot1
#23 An Entire Box Of Ice Creams Like This
Image credits: sham27
#24 Once You Turn This Jar Of Sprinkles Upside Down, You See The Real Quantity
Image credits: Bobrobot1
#25 There’s Just Enough To Fit In The Window
Image credits: MikeV77
#26 $20 For 11 Chocolates. Happy Valentines
Image credits: itsaTalkingMuffin
#27 Just Enough To Make It To The Line
Image credits: SpasticGoldfeesh
#28 “Fruit Bread”
Image credits: A_fucking__user
#29 An Entire Tin Containing 8 Mini Snickers
Image credits: SweatersAndShawarma
#30 This Vegan Ground Meat
Image credits: erdbeertee
Go to Source
Author: Ieva Pečiulytė